NBS in agriculture and nature
AN1: Land Degradation and Restoration. Problems and solutions
Description
Land degradation is a multifaceted challenge that requires coordinated global, national, and local action. Addressing it is essential not only for environmental sustainability but also for social and economic development. With effective policies, community involvement, and sustainable practices, it is possible to reverse degradation and restore land productivity. Land restoration refers to the process of rehabilitating degraded land to regain its ecological integrity and productivity. It aims to reverse land degradation, restore ecosystem functions, and improve the livelihoods of people dependent on the land. Land restoration promotes the rebuilding soil fertility and structure, improve water retention, reduce soil erosion, restore biodiversity, recover the native vegetation, enhance climate resilience, and support sustainable livelihoods and enhance food security. The restoration of the land has been classified as i) ecological when focus on re-establishing native ecosystems, including plant and animal species, and restoring natural processes; ii) agroecological when combines ecological principles with agricultural practices to sustainably restore productivity, often using agroforestry, crop rotation, and organic methods; iii) reclamation, aimed at heavily degraded lands (e.g., mines), often requiring soil amendments, grading, and infrastructure for erosion control; and iv) reforestation and afforestation when planting trees to restore forest cover on degraded or deforested lands. The land restoration techniques require: i) revegetation when planting native or adapted species to stabilize the soil; ii) contour ploughing and terracing to reduce runoff and soil erosion in sloping terrain; iii) agroforestry when combined crops and trees; iv) composting and mulching to improve soil organic matter, water retention and runoff control; v) check dams and swales to reduce surface water flows and recharge aquifers; vi) soil amendments to recover soil properties. The benefits of land restoration are multiple: i) increase agriculture productivity, improve water availability and quality, sequesters carbon and then mitigate climate change, enhance biodiversity and wildlife habitat, reduce disaster risks (floodings, landslides..), and support economic development and food security. However, the land restoration faces many challenges: i) high cost; ii) long timeframes; iii) land tenure and governance issues; iv) climate variability; v) monitoring and evaluation complexity. The restoration programs are actives in all over the world. The UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (20212030), the Bonn Challenge Aims to restore 350 million hectares by 2030, the Great Green Wall (Africa) combats desertification in the Sahel and the Land Degradation Neutrality (SDG Target 15.3). And, although some programs fail, others show very positive results: i) Loess Plateau, China, transformed degraded land into productive farmland through terracing and reforestation; ii) Rwandas Gishwati Forest that successfully restoration of biodiversity and erosion control through agroforestry; and Indias Watershed Development Projects that restored arid and semi-arid lands using water harvesting and soil conservation. This scientific session welcome research and study cases (stakeholders) on land degradation and land restoration. Information from the problems and solutions on land degradation issues are welcome.AN2: Innovative means for sustainable disposal of animal farming liquid manure
AN3: Plant biostimulants for a more sustainable agriculture
AN4: Nature-Based Solutions in Agriculture: Innovations, Evidence, and Practice
AN5: Circular Nutrient Systems for Agricultural Transitions: Integrating Ecology, Governance, and Modelling
AN6: Biophysical Approach to Terroirs
AN7: Open session on Nature-Based Solutions in Agricultural and Natural Landscapes
AN8: Agro Building Carbon: Bridging Agriculture and Construction for Carbon Climate Solutions (Panel)
NBS for natural hazards mitigation
NH1: Fire in the Earth System. Understanding fire and society
Description
Fire has been part of the Earth System for the last 400 million years and humans are the sole species that controls and manages fire. We have used fire for over a million years, both, as hunter gatherers managing the landscape with fire, and as farmers using fire as a low-cost, efficient and ecological tool for clearing and maintaining the productivity of land. Fire has been highlighted as the most influential element in the development of human societies. However, fire has also always been a threat to humans, and despite accompanying human evolution, our understanding of fire remains very limited.
In general, fires are more present in the European forest, grasslands and scrublands due to four key factors: i) the expansion of forests due to land abandonment: ii) the increase of fuel load and fuel continuity due to the lack of forest management; iii) the high number of ignitions and climate change induced higher temperatures; and, iv) a reduction in precipitation of some climatic belts such as the Mediterranean, and an increase in the evapotranspiration rate. These conditions cause the potential for catastrophic fires as we saw in many regions of the world along the last four decades. This calls for a new approach in fire fighting, instead of fire suppression, to focus on long term fire prevention through forest management by reducing fuel load and fuel continuity at a landscape level. To be able to accomplish these new strategies many questions need to be answered both from a scientific as well as from a policy and socio-economic point of view. There are multiple aspects in fire research (prevention, fire dynamics, fire effects on soils, hydrology and vegetation and fire risk), however, even tough these aspects of fire are all interlinked they are researched mostly separately and therefore are unable to answer the holistic questions needed to come to implementable management strategies and coherent policies The scientific questions are not solved due to the lack of exchanges, interaction and collaboration within research teams. There is a clear lack of communication within the scientific community, and the reduce connectivity in exchange of knowledge and data within the fire research teams ends in a slow advance of science that can be speeded up with more communication.
This scientific session wish to allow networking and scientific exchange to scientific discovery and coordinate efforts among research institutions, scientists and stakeholders. Without a better understanding of fire, safety technologies needed to protect our citizens we cannot provide a safer environment to the citizens. The final objective is to built a safer world for citizens, their economic resources and promote the scientific knowledge exchange.
NH2: Flood Recovery - Interdisciplinary Perspectives into Post-Disaster Governance
NH3: Open session on Nature-Based Solutions for Natural Hazard Mitigation
NH4: Success Factors in Wetland Restoration for Enhancing Natural Water Retention Capacity
NBS in urban areas
UR1: Decentralised Urban Water Systems for Circularity
Description
Decentralised systems are increasingly recognised as essential components of sustainable urban water management, offering cities greater flexibility, resilience, and circularity, especially as climate change, population growth, and supply variability intensify pressure on conventional networks. Enhancing urban water circularity requires advancing sustainable, efficient, and safe management of non-conventional water resources, reducing reliance on traditional water supplies, and integrating decentralised green infrastructure solutions with existing centralised urban systems. Despite the benefits, only a small portion of the vast volume of treated wastewater is reused in urban contexts, while greywater and urban runoffs remain largely untapped due to regulatory, monitoring, acceptance, and implementation barriers.
This session brings together a broad community of researchers and innovators working on decentralised urban water solutions, including those implemented under PRIMA, Horizon Europe, Water4All, LIFE and national programmes, as well as practitioners, SMEs, utilities, municipalities, and international experts. Its aim is to bridge scientific advances with practical experience and real-world deployment.
Areas of focus include nature-based and hybrid solutions of compact and modular treatment that enable greywater reuse, stormwater harvesting, as well as and digital tools for spatial or economic optimisation, and digital monitoring tools for safe and efficient operation. Contributions on long-term operation and maintenance, user acceptance, risk assessment, and of decentralised systems are highly encouraged. Topics related to governance, regulation, and policy interfaces are also welcome, particularly where they connect to and complement other TerraEnVision sessions.
By creating a space for dialogue between science, industry, and public authorities, the session seeks to identify synergies across projects and regions, explore opportunities for joint demonstrations, and connect innovative SMEs with real urban challenges. Participants will gain insights into emerging solutions and collaborative pathways toward circular and resilient urban water management.
UR2: Greening Cities for Climate Action: Resilience, Mitigation, and Community Well-Being
UR3: Cross scale approach for NBS integrations in urban ecosystems
UR3: Scaling Urban Nature-Based Solutions: Governance, Trade-Offs and Multi-Stakeholder Action
UR4: Phytomanagement as Nature-Based Solution for sustainable land management
UR5: Open session on NBS in urban environments
UR6: Harnessing Indigenous Knowledge for Climate-Resilient Urban Futures in Coastal Cities (Panel)
UR7: Nature-Based Solutions for Climate-Resilient Urban Spatial Planning and Sustainable City Development (Panel)
Methodologies in measuring and implementing NBS
MET1: Integrated Methodologies for Measuring Implementation and Impacts of Equitable Nature-Based Solutions and Green-Blue Infrastructures
Description
There is a growing need for a deeper understanding of integrated methodologies for implementing, monitoring, and evaluating nature-based solutions (NBS) and green-blue infrastructure (GBI) to enhance their effectiveness and support upscaling across diverse socio-ecological contexts, particularly in urban and peri-urban areas.
While existing studies and frameworks by international organisations like the IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Gold Standard provide baseline principles and guidelines for NBS design, implementation, and impact evaluation, there remain significant gaps in operationalising these principles and guidelines through integrated methodologies that capture complex social-ecological interactions, equity, and long-term sustainability of NBS and GBI. For instance, IUCN has developed guidance to ensure NBS effectively address societal challenges and promote transparent and empowering governance processes. However, it does not fully guide on methodologies for implementing, monitoring, and evaluating NBS across multiple social-ecological contexts.
This session aims to explore participatory and co-creation approaches such as stakeholder workshops, empirical surveys, citizen sciences and social media analysis to advance NBS and GBI implementation through a One Health lens embedded within a broader Planetary Health framework. These approaches generate robust evidence on how green and blue spaces enhance human health and well-being, ecosystem health and social equity, while strengthening ecological resilience and reducing environmental drivers of diseases across urban and peri-urban contexts.
By linking local social-ecological interactions with earth system processes and planetary boundaries, the session emphasizes methodological innovations that operationalise One Health and Planetary Health principles by translating theoretical frameworks into practical tools for monitoring, evaluation, and strategic integration of NBS and GBI in urban planning processes. Particular attention is given to co-creation with diverse stakeholders, the development of evaluation frameworks and guidelines, policy strategies that recognise the human and environmental health and well-being and methodologies for measuring mental health impacts and long-term sustainability.
Researchers are invited to submit empirical and conceptual papers advancing methodological approaches for NBS implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Contributions should focus on integrated methods that translate theoretical principles into practical experiences, integrate social, ecological, and governance dimensions, and incorporate users perspectives across diverse contexts. Papers may also address innovative tools for NBS and GBI design and upscaling, and long-term sustainability.
The session aims to foster interactive discussion among researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to exchange methodological experiences on NBS and GBI approaches and identify pathways for equitable NBS and GBI development across regions.
MET2: Digital transformation for the design, monitoring, and scaling of greenhouse gas mitigation through Nature-Based Solutions
MET3: Case Studies and Quantitative Methodologies for Nature-based Solutions Integrated into Urban Infrastructure Constraints
MET4: Advancing the assessment of Nature-based Solutions for Agriculture and Food Systems within Planetary Boundaries
MET5: Nature based solutions and the role of soil life and soil ecosystem services
MET6: Tracking the ecological value of nature with the help of new technological methods - DNA-based monitoring methods and their biological, legal and economic challenges
MET7: Open session on methodologies for implementation and monitoring of NBS
Science-Society
SO1: More than Green - Towards more just, inclusive NBS reflecting socio-cultural and socio-economic aspects
Description
The concept of Nature based solutions (NBS) aims to simultaneously provide environmental, social and economic benefits for more sustainable communities. A key success factor in the implementation, acceptance, and appropriation of NBS is ensuring that interventions address the needs and ambitions of the communities where they are established, while distributing benefits fairly and equitably among stakeholders. In recent years, inclusivity and giving voice to marginalized and underrepresented groups as well as how the needs of nature are articulated in decision making processes are increasingly gaining relevance in both research and practice when co-creating NBS.
For the proposed session for TERRAenVISION 6, the aim is to gather insights and evidence from current research and practical applications on the social-cultural and socio-economic dimensions of NBS. Together, we will reflect about both theoretical foundations why it is relevant to give voice to various stakeholder groups, reflect how the needs of nature are given voice, collect insights about pathways and discuss strategies to make NBS more inclusive.












